Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ambulance Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County delays ambulance purchase after questions about chassis pricing, remount vs. new unit
Summary
Commissioners discussed an ambulance procurement that included a listed remount and chassis estimates; concerns over pricing language and chassis contingency prompted a motion to table the purchase to the next meeting.
Commissioners reviewed specifications and pricing for a new ambulance or ambulance remount and agreed to table the procurement after questions about ambiguous chassis pricing and contract fine print.
A staff presentation listed a line described in the transcript as “Total amount, $36,063,000” followed by itemized amounts that included $280,009.53 for an ambulance remount, $78,047 for a chassis and about $4,000 for graphics. Commissioners asked whether “remount” was the correct term and whether the specification meant a brand-new unit or purchasing a remounted box on an existing chassis.
One commissioner said the bid specifications described “the new box” and that if the bid meets the county’s requirements, it should be approved subject to final sign-off; another commissioner raised concerns about a chassis price being an estimate and about fine-print reservations in the purchase agreement. A commissioner said they would not approve a purchase agreement that left the county exposed to a delivery-price increase in the fine print.
Because of those concerns, the court made a motion to table the item to the next meeting; the motion passed and the item was deferred for further clarification of chassis pricing and contract terms.
Ending: Staff and commissioners asked for clearer contract language confirming whether the vendor was selling a fully new unit or a remount and for firm chassis pricing before returning the item for formal approval.
