Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Proceedings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Council approves consent and continuation items, splits on one matter
Summary
The council approved a broad set of regular-agenda and consent items, sent one item back to committee, continued a parcel map, and approved one item on a 10-3 vote; several items were approved unanimously or by large majorities.
The Los Angeles City Council recorded a series of roll-call actions during its February 25 meeting, approving multiple consent and regular-agenda items, continuing several matters for further review and voting 10-3 on a contested item.
Key outcomes recorded during the session included:
- Items 1 through 3 (noted as notices for public hearing): public hearing opened and closed with no speakers; council recorded approval, 13 ayes.
- Items 4 through 6 (public hearings previously held): approved, 13 ayes.
- Items 8 through 31 (regular agenda, with item 14 and 32 called special and handled separately): approved by roll call, 13 ayes for the block of items called.
- Item 14 (called special, then recommended for approval): approved, 13 ayes.
- Items 35 a and b (continued/administrative financial items): Councilmember Hernandez moved continuation; the council approved 35 a and b, 14 ayes (unanimous among members present at that vote).
- Item 34 (on the continuation agenda): the council voted on item 34; the clerk announced the tally as 10 ayes and 3 nos, and the item was approved.
- Item 33 (Quimby funds report): referred back to Arts, Health & Humanities Committee for further analysis (see separate article).
- Item 36 (parcel map/recordation matter tied to a Home Depot development): continued one day for planning and city-attorney input (see separate article).
Several votes were recorded as unanimous or by a strong majority; absent members were noted in roll calls when applicable. Where staff recommended continuances or committee referral, the council followed those recommendations or directed staff to return with additional analyses.
