Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council sends review of Quimby park-fee policy back to committee
Summary
Councilmembers asked staff to return to Arts, Health & Humanities with options to expand or revise how Quimby funds are used, including whether the city policy limiting spending within roughly 1.5 miles of a development should be revisited; item was referred back to committee for further study.
The Los Angeles City Council voted to send back for further study a report on the use of Quimby park-development funds, asking staff to return to the Arts, Health & Humanities Committee with legal and policy options. Councilmember Hernandez led a prolonged discussion pressing the city to consider whether the city�s long-standing mile-and-a-half policy for Quimby-funded projects should be changed to address park inequities across neighborhoods.
Hernandez said the city�s distribution of Quimby funds contributes to an imbalance in open-space access and asked staff to recommend ways the council could create more equitable park distribution. He noted the policy at issue had been in place for decades and asked whether the city could use its legislative package or city policy changes to obtain greater flexibility.
City staff and councilmembers discussed legal constraints. City attorneys and planning staff cautioned the council that any change must preserve a legal nexus between fees collected and benefits to the paying community. Staff said they would coordinate with the planning department and return with options that explain what the city can do administratively and what would require state-level change.
Councilmember Walters urged a full review and asked that the item be returned to Arts, Health & Humanities with clear recommendations. The council instructed staff to examine possible revisions to policy and, where appropriate, pathways to seek changes to state law or the city�s legislative agenda.
The council formally referred the item back to the Arts, Health & Humanities Committee for a report with legal analysis and proposed next steps.
