Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Meadowtown holds public hearing on proposed fiscal-year budget; council flags $30,000 depreciation carryover
Summary
At a public hearing on the proposed fiscal-year budget, Meadowtown councilors and staff discussed a $30,000 depreciation carryover that staff said should be zeroed out, questions about utility purchase descriptions and a donation/sign inquiry. The council closed the hearing and said it will return with any amendments before a final vote.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Meeting chair (unidentified) opened a public hearing on Meadowtown's proposed budget for the fiscal year that begins July 1, saying the council had reviewed draft line-item budgets and would take public comments before returning to the council for any amendments.
The discussion focused on how the town's budgeting system carries forward certain line items. A council member pointed to a $30,000 depreciation or loan line showing on the draft and asked why it remained if loans are paid off. Finance staff (unidentified) acknowledged the figure appeared to be a system carryover and said they would check and “zero that out.” "I will double check on that," the staff member said. The staff member also said, "I'm gonna write 0," indicating an intent to propose removing the placeholder amount from the next draft.
Council members described the budget process as based on estimates of revenues (taxes, electricity and water usage) and expenses (salaries, utilities and maintenance), and said major unplanned repairs would require returning to a public hearing and moving funds between categories. "If we needed to repair a road, significant road repair, water repair, utility repair, that we did not budget for, if we didn't have those funds allocated, we would have to come back, make a proposal on a public hearing, move funds to accomplish that," Meeting chair (unidentified) said.
Separately, members and attendees raised questions about how the town labels purchased power in the draft (references to purchases from "Dixie Power" and a line labeled "UN"), and asked for clarification about a proposed donation or expenditure of roughly $1,000 for a sign related to the cemetery. The chair said the council would look up the town's sign and donation policy and requested the person raising the issue make a formal proposal if they wanted council action. The person raising the donation question was identified in discussion as "Tony," but no formal proposal or ordinance was offered during the hearing.
A resident asked whether anyone was proposing a new subdivision in town. Council members said they were not aware of a formal subdivision proposal at that time.
After roughly an hour of review and questions, a council member moved to close the public hearing; the motion was called and members responded "Aye." No final budget adoption vote was recorded at the hearing.
The council directed staff to confirm the depreciation/loan carryover and to present a corrected draft (with the carryover zeroed out if appropriate) for consideration at a future council meeting. The council also asked staff to clarify the labels for purchased power in the draft budget and to review town policy on donations and sign placement before any council action on those specifics.
