Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stateboard Aib Mou topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State board, AIB approve memorandum of understanding to clarify Blueprint roles
Summary
The Maryland State Board of Education voted unanimously on June 25 to approve a memorandum of understanding with the Accountability and Implementation Board that clarifies which agency will lead, consult on or jointly manage specific elements of Blueprint implementation.
Get email alerts on the Stateboard Aib Mou topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Maryland State Board of Education voted unanimously on June 25 to approve a memorandum of understanding with the Accountability and Implementation Board that clarifies which agency will lead, consult on or jointly manage specific elements of implementation of the Blueprint for Maryland's Future.
Board President Michael introduced the agreement as "a new delineation of responsibilities between our two agencies" designed to give local school systems clearer guidance about where to go for support. State Superintendent Dr. Monica Wright and AIB staff framed the MOU as intended to move the Blueprint from launch into large-scale implementation.
The MOU assigns the AIB a continued role leading Blueprint plan approval and progress monitoring while the Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE) and the State Board will lead and fully own many implementation activities that require practitioner expertise. "Local school systems have very clearly asked for this," Alex Reese, MSDE staff, told the board during the presentation. Reese said the document translates statutory responsibilities into operational ownership and reduces duplication.
AIB leaders were represented in the discussions leading up to the agreement; the record cites Chair Leggett, co-chair Kerwin and AIB Executive Director Heiss as part of ongoing coordination with State Board leadership. The board heard staff say the MOU follows roughly a year of meetings among the agencies and stakeholders to determine which functions should move to department implementation and which remain AIB-led.
Board members asked for specifics about several line items in the MOU, including whether AIB would continue to oversee monitoring of teacher-preparation programs. MSDE and AIB staff explained that some responsibilities are derived from statutory language in the Blueprint and related law; where statute names one agency the MOU preserves that assignment but clarifies consultation and staff-level coordination.
After a brief debate, the board approved the MOU on a motion by Member Paul with a second from Member Crawford. The board recorded the vote as unanimous, including members participating online.
Officials said the AIB will take up the MOU at its meeting later in the week and, if it also approves the document, both chairs will sign the agreement and the delineation will go into effect.
What this means next: MSDE and the AIB said they will use the MOU to guide local district requests for support and to coordinate work such as career counseling, statewide coaching programs and plan review. MSDE staff said operational details (who leads which trainings, who reviews which plans) are described in a companion delineation document attached to the MOU and will be used to schedule joint and single-agency tasks going forward.
Board and agency officials told the room the change is intended to reduce confusion among superintendents and principals about where to seek help as Blueprint implementation moves from planning to broad implementation.
Votes and next steps: The board voted unanimously to approve the MOU; AIB consideration was expected at its next meeting. If AIB approves, the chairs of both bodies will sign the agreement and staff will publish the companion delineation that lists pillar-by-pillar responsibilities.
(Reporting note: coverage here is based on the boardroom presentations and staff remarks recorded in the board meeting transcript.)

