Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the General Fund Forecast topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District outlines 2025‑26 general fund forecast as ESSER money winds down; board warns of future tradeoffs
Summary
At a June 24 workshop the district presented its preliminary general fund budget for 2025‑26, showing lower projected fund balance as COVID relief (ESSER) funding sunsets and new legislative changes affect state revenue. Board members discussed risks, vacancy assumptions and the need for continued fiscal caution.
Manatee County School District staff on June 24 presented a preliminary general fund forecast for fiscal 2025‑26 that shows a lower projected fund balance as one‑time federal COVID relief money is exhausted and state funding changes and voucher growth affect revenues.
Budget staff said the district began the cycle with a high beginning fund balance acquired after multi‑year ESSER funding and conservative spending. For 2025‑26 staff projected beginning resources, transfers and revenues that would yield an estimated ending reserve around 8.68 percent of the general fund — slightly above the board’s 8.5 percent target — but well below recent multi‑year highs that reflected ESSER carryover.
Key assumptions staff highlighted included a 95 percent vacancy fill factor (a conservative change from prior years), a 2% tax collector commission being taken from the voted millage (which staff said reduces referendum proceeds), a $3 million budget line for upcoming textbook adoptions (world languages and related shipping/consumables) and a projected increase in school taxable value that raised local revenue estimates.
Legislative changes staff summarized included a new categorical for academic acceleration options (AP/IB/dual enrollment/early graduation) worth about $7.7 million statewide for the district, a $41.62 increase in the base student allocation (BSA) that generated an approximate $5.4 million increase in FEFP funding, and adjustments to program cost factors that reduced district revenue in other lines.
Board members pressed for more regular tracking and earlier warning signals. Several asked for monthly or early‑September updates tied to enrollment and 10‑day counts (which inform state calculations), and requested historical tables comparing budgeted and actual tax collections and charter proportions so the board can see prior forecasting accuracy. Trustees and staff also discussed the tension between using one‑time fund balance for urgent programmatic needs versus preserving reserves to ensure long‑term sustainability.
Why it matters: the district winds down pandemic relief funds and faces new state policy and voucher dynamics that change how much recurring revenue is available. That affects decisions about hiring, program expansions and long‑term commitments.
Next steps: staff said they will provide more detailed scenarios, vacancy tracking and a July briefing before the formal advertising of the tentative millage. The board directed staff to return with more detailed enrollment, charter trend data and monthly vacancy reporting.
