Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Nutrition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
School nutrition director proposes 25¢ price increase for breakfast and lunch; board questions marketing and participation
Summary
Tiffany Lawrence reported rising labor and food costs and recommended increasing breakfast and lunch prices by 25¢ each; the board discussed participation, federal reimbursement, marketing to boost paid participation and other strategies to offset program shortfalls.
Tiffany Lawrence, a staff member in Child Nutrition Services, told the Wake County Board of Education that rising labor and food costs are straining the school nutrition program and recommended a 25¢ increase to both breakfast and lunch prices.
Why it matters: Lawrence said the district’s food program operates as an enterprise and that cost pressures — wages, benefits and food prices — have grown over the past decade. She told the board that increasing breakfast and lunch by 25¢ would generate an estimated $17,000 for breakfast and $554,000 for lunch in additional revenue at current participation levels.
Lawrence presented 10-year trends she said were significant to the recommendation: hourly wages for nutrition staff rose from about $11.58 ten years ago to $13–$17.75 depending on peer comparisons; benefit costs (retirement, medical, dental, workers’ comp) have increased; and food-item costs have meaningfully risen (for example, a chicken sandwich moved from $0.38 to $1.15 in her examples). She also described the Angel Fund, a donation pool used to cover student meals when accounts are short; Lawrence said the fund covered about 5,800 breakfasts and 27,000 lunches this year.
Board members pressed on the tradeoffs. Miss Gordon and other members warned that price increases can depress participation among families who pay, and Miss Evans and Miss Rice raised marketing and program-design options to increase paid participation and reduce stigma.
“Historically, when a food district raises meal prices, you tend to lose some participation,” Lawrence said; she described potential revenue loss as an uncertainty the department must weigh. Board members urged more aggressive marketing and cross-department work to normalize the meal program, gather student preferences and improve participation and quality. Miss Rice proposed reframing applications and outreach as data collection to improve the nutrition program rather than framing them as free-and-reduced paperwork.
The board asked about federal reimbursement. Lawrence said current federal reimbursement for a free lunch was about $4.54 and that the USDA sets national reimbursement rates; members discussed that reimbursement does not vary by local cost of living and suggested the district could seek more information from USDA about locality adjustments.
Lawrence’s recommendation was presented as an action-item for the evening agenda; during the work session the board asked questions and offered direction but did not vote on the price change.
