Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Superintendent Evaluation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pleasantville board goes into closed session to discuss superintendent evaluation after parent endorsement
Summary
A parent urged the board to give Superintendent Dr. Marilyn Martinez an outstanding evaluation; the board then entered executive session under NJSA 10:4-12 and 10:4-13 to discuss personnel. No details were disclosed publicly when the board returned.
At a June 17 special meeting the Pleasantville Board of Education moved into a closed executive session to discuss the superintendent’s evaluation and other personnel matters, citing New Jersey statutes for closed meetings.
Before the board recessed to private session, Priscilla Noel, identified in the meeting as a Pleasantville parent, addressed the board during the public comment period and urged trustees to give Superintendent Dr. Marilyn Martinez an “outstanding” evaluation. Noel said stability and consistent leadership were the primary considerations and said she had observed improved staff formality and student responses since Martinez arrived.
Following public comments, the board voted to enter executive session. Board Member Akins moved to go into closed session to discuss the superintendent’s evaluation; Board Member Silver seconded. The chair read a resolution stating the board would meet in closed session under NJSA 10:4-12 and NJSA 10:4-13 to discuss personnel matters and that any disclosures would be made when confidentiality was no longer required. The roll call taken before recess recorded affirmative votes from board members present and the motion carried.
The transcript records the board reconvening in public later in the meeting after an executive-session discussion. No substantive details of the superintendent evaluation, any ratings, contract decisions or personnel actions were disclosed in the public portion of the meeting. The board indicated that matters discussed in closed session would be disclosed at this or a future meeting “when it is no longer necessary to maintain the confidential nature of the items discussed,” but the transcript does not record any further public disclosure on the evaluation at that session.
Board members offered brief closing remarks thanking attendees and announcing upcoming events; none of those comments included additional information about the closed-session discussion or any decision related to the superintendent’s employment.
Because the substantive evaluation discussion occurred in executive session, the public transcript does not contain documents, ratings, or specific board directions about the superintendent’s contract or performance.
