Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Glove factory draws mixed reaction at county meeting; business leaders tout jobs, residents cite health concerns
Summary
Public comment at the June 17 meeting included both support for a proposed glove‑manufacturing facility—cite job creation and payroll benefits—and concerns about chemical use, emissions and permitting from residents who asked for stricter scrutiny and community engagement.
A proposed glove‑manufacturing project prompted sharply different public comments at the Nye County Board of County Commissioners meeting on June 17, with local business owners praising job and tax‑revenue projections while residents expressed worry about environmental and health impacts and the permitting process.
Supporters and economic argument
Local entrepreneur Tim Doyle called the project a major local employer, telling the board the factory is projected to create more than 300 jobs over 10 years, provide health insurance for a portion of those positions and generate millions in payroll and tax revenue. “As a local business owner, I wanted to support the building of the manufacturing facility,” Doyle said, noting support from the state’s Governor’s Office of Economic Development.
Residents raise environmental and process questions
Other residents said they had done online research and raised concerns about reported chemical use at glove facilities and potential risks to groundwater and air quality. “They use acid… it can burn your lungs. I'm really concerned about anything like that because if it gets into the groundwater… it could kill them,” said Beth Borysiewicz. Neighbors also complained about the timing of groundbreakings and asked whether proper permits and environmental reviews had been completed.
County response
Commissioners did not take action on the project at the meeting. County staff noted permitting and planning processes would apply and encouraged community members to raise specific concerns with land‑use and building officials. A representative of the U.S. Department of Agriculture attended the meeting and announced rural‑development resources are available to local businesses.
Next steps
The project proponents and opponents will likely continue outreach and permitting activity. County planning and environmental staff will process any formal land‑use or building permits and, if applicable, the project would undergo required environmental and public‑notice reviews before construction proceeds.
