Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Agenda Votes Continuances topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Assessment appeals board approves stipulations, grants continuances and schedules new hearing dates

2473494 · March 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Ventura County Assessment Appeals Board approved multiple stipulations, granted postponements with data‑exchange deadlines and amended several appeal dockets during its March 3 session; most motions passed unanimously.

The Ventura County Assessment Appeals Board No. 1 took a series of routine and contested procedural actions on March 3, approving stipulation agreements, accepting non‑original signatures in one case, and granting continuances for multiple contested appeals. Several motions passed unanimously.

Key outcomes (votes at a glance)

- Agenda review approved (motion passed unanimously).

- Items 9–23 (Los Robles Regional Medical Center): Board approved large‑reduction stipulation agreements (exceeding $5 million) after applicant and assessor signaled agreement; motion passed unanimously.

- Items 24–29 (Los Robles related parcels): Assessor requested continuance to allow a business‑property audit to finish; parties agreed to continue to Nov. 10, 2025; motion passed unanimously. (No data exchange required until audit complete.)

- Application 23‑10014–10016 (major Wagon Wheel case): Board amended applications to add two parcel numbers (APNs ending in ...425 and ...165) to the listed appeals so the appraisal unit covers the relevant parcels; motion passed unanimously. (Separate hearing for merits continued as recorded in the main case.)

- Application 23‑10578 (Richard Kaufman revocable trust): Board vacated a prior stipulation approval due to a clerical/controller error and approved corrected stipulation agreement; motion passed unanimously.

- Application 23‑10828 (4144MDRLLC): Board approved a large reduction stipulation exceeding $5 million; motion passed unanimously.

- Multiple individual appeals continued with data provisos (common pattern: motion to continue to specific dates with condition that any data requested by the assessor be provided at least 30 days prior to the new hearing): - Michael Dawson: continued to May 5, 2025, with required data delivered 30 days prior; motion passed unanimously. - Randy Tackett Trust: continued to April 7, 2025, with applicant to provide either the trust document if found or a letter explaining inability to locate it; motion passed unanimously. - SRPFC/Logistics Center (Altus/Chris Larson): continued to May 5, 2025; motion passed unanimously. - Huntington Manor LLC (Michael Labeaux): continued to June 2, 2025, with 30‑day data proviso; motion passed unanimously. - Justin Monteig: continued to May 5, 2025, with 30‑day data proviso; motion passed unanimously. - Heath Family Trust (Felipe Richland): continued to April 7, 2025; motion passed unanimously. - Howard Jessica Rootin Family Trust: continued to April 7, 2025; motion passed unanimously.

- Reconsideration (Mr. Malamut): The hearing officer denial for failure to appear was vacated on the board’s reconsideration. The board approved a remote presentation for the applicant (to present remotely) and continued the matter to May 5, 2025, with the applicant required to deliver six printed copies of exhibits to the clerk at least two business days prior and data to the assessor 30 days prior; motion passed unanimously.

- Stipulation approvals and non‑original signatures: The board approved certain facsimile non‑original stipulation agreements after the assessor confirmed three documented attempts to obtain original signatures; motions passed unanimously. Routine stipulation agreements were also approved.

What the board emphasized

- The assessor repeatedly sought a 30‑day data‑exchange timeline before rescheduled hearings; the board routinely included that proviso in continuance motions.

- When the assessor indicated a potential increase of assessed value on a parcel, the board asked the parties to waive the 10‑day pre‑hearing notice requirement (required if assessor seeks a higher value than on the roll); parties waived the notice in the relevant instance so the hearing could proceed.

Procedure and next steps

Parties granted continuances were instructed to provide requested records to the assessor within the stated 30‑day windows ahead of new hearing dates. For matters that were continued to later months, hearing officers and clerks will confirm calendar availability and exchange deadlines by email.