Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident urges Littleton to prioritize historic preservation plan, warns mid-century assets at risk

2626296 · February 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A nearby resident and frequent public commenter told the Historic Preservation Commission that the city has delayed a promised historic preservation plan and that Littleton’s mid-century modern commercial and residential assets are at risk without integration into planning work.

Pam Chadbourne, a Littleton resident who said she lives about a block and a half from city hall, used the public-comment period at the Historic Preservation Commission meeting to urge the city to place historic preservation higher in planning priorities and to complete a promised historic preservation plan.

Chadbourne said she attended the public meetings when the city’s comprehensive plan was adopted and that the comprehensive-plan commitment was to add a historic preservation plan within a year. “You know what? It’s five years later and counting, and it has not been added,” she told the commission. She warned the commission that mid-century modern assets — both commercial properties along Littleton Boulevard and adjacent residential neighborhoods — are being lost and that those middle-class assets are especially vulnerable.

Chadbourne said she has attended City Council retreats where, she said, the city manager deprioritized historic preservation items. She criticized what she described as a lack of public inclusion in the Littleton Boulevard sub-area planning process and said the city’s management is “broken” when it comes to integrating historic preservation into broader planning.

Her comments were made during the general public-comment period (not during a public hearing) and drew no immediate commission action; commissioners noted they could raise the issue with staff or place it on a future agenda or joint study session with City Council. Staff later referenced a joint City Council–HPC study session scheduled for Feb. 25 to discuss priorities, and staff said the preservation program and a contracted survey effort would be part of upcoming work-program items.