Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Youth Homelessness topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House codifies 'safe spaces' youth-shelter program amid debate over parental notification
Summary
Lawmakers voted to codify a youth 'safe spaces' program set to sunset, extending statutory authority for youth homeless shelters. Supporters cited life‑saving outcomes and that the program began under Act 130 (2022); opponents raised concerns about parental notification and parents' rights when children seek shelter.
The Hawaii House approved legislation to codify the state’s youth “safe spaces” program and to reestablish shelters for unhoused youth, prompting extended debate over parental notification and program scope.
Representative Matt Alcos (opposition) said he supports the intent—finding safe housing for youth—but objected to provisions that could delay parents’ knowledge of their child's whereabouts: “I would like to see this bill have more parents right to, understand that they're safe…we just wanna know that our kids are safe.”
Proponents said the bill continues an existing program created by Act 130 in 2022 and rejects the notion that the bill enables runaway children to hide from caring parents. Representative Tam said the legislation “codifies the state, safe spaces for youth program, which sunsets this summer. It's a very widely successful program that started with act 130 in 2022. This primarily is about establishing youth homeless shelters. It's not about a bill that would allow runaway kids to just hide away from their parents.”
Representative Capella, who described visiting a shelter opening, recounted a participant’s account and urged support: “Programs like this save lives because that young woman might not be alive.” Supporters cited data from the National Network of Youth Communities, saying shelters show higher success rates for housing stability, school enrollment and reductions in risky behavior.
Opponents that raised parental-rights concerns repeatedly sought greater transparency for parents and whether the bill's protections would allow parents to know their child's location sooner. The transcript records a number of members entering reservations and asking that comments be entered into the journal.
The measure was discussed under Standing Committee Report 963 and was identified on the floor as HB 613, House Draft 1, during the clerk’s vote readout. The clerk’s tally included several members recorded as voting no; the clerk later announced that the measures passed third reading. The transcript does not include implementation details such as the number or location of new shelters, funding sources, or operational rules for notification timelines.
Legislators said the bill aims to preserve services for unhoused youth as the earlier pilot program sunset approaches; however, several members asked for clarifications about parental notification timelines and protections for families in which parents are a source of harm.
