Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Lab School topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House indefinitely postpones bill to reestablish University of Wyoming lab school after lengthy debate
Summary
After several hours of debate about governance, funding and local control, the Wyoming House of Representatives voted to indefinitely postpone Senate File 126, a bill to re-create a K–8 laboratory school at the University of Wyoming.
Get email alerts on the Education Lab School topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Wyoming House of Representatives on Feb. 28, 2025, voted 24–32 to indefinitely postpone Senate File 126, legislation that would have reestablished a K–8 laboratory school at the University of Wyoming and set a new governance and funding model for the school.
"This legislation is not about saving a school. It is about protecting a legacy and educating future generations of Wyoming teachers," Representative Andrew, the bill sponsor in the House, told members during a lengthy floor debate that stretched across committee and full-house discussion.
Supporters said the bill would restore the lab school's historic mission — training pre-service teachers and serving as a model site for project‑based, learner‑centered instruction — and keep it available as a statewide resource. Representative Kelly urged colleagues to preserve the institution, saying, "This is our last chance to save this unique institution." The bill would have created an independent governing board, required annual reporting to the Joint Education Committee, and used language from the state's charter statutes to define the school’s funding model.
Opponents objected that the proposal improperly inserts the Legislature into a local dispute between the university and the local school district. Representative Lolli, who opposed the bill, said the Legislature was not the proper venue to resolve a local governance dispute and noted the school "has not been operated as a lab school for six years," arguing that local control and local solutions should be pursued first. Critics also raised questions about ongoing responsibilities for building maintenance and the cost of renovating the facility; Representative Sherwood warned that "the funding model still allocates the resources to the school district," and said the bill did not resolve who would pay major maintenance costs for a facility state construction officials previously flagged as needing replacement.
Members debated two amendments on the floor. A standing committee amendment revised the baseline year used to calculate average daily membership for funding (the committee substituted the 2023–24 school year to better reflect likely enrollment); that amendment was adopted. A Committee of the Whole amendment that would have changed the composition and selection of the school's governing board failed on a 29–22 division vote and later the full-body roll call left the bill short of passage.
Supporters pointed to the lab school's historic role in training teachers and argued the bill preserved a unique statewide resource. Opponents stressed constitutional and precedent concerns, including language cited during debate referencing Article 7, Section 17 of the Wyoming Constitution on university management and Article 3, Section 27 regarding special legislation, and warned of opening the door to many future state interventions in local school matters.
The House recorded a roll-call vote after a standing division failed to resolve the outcome. The chief clerk announced the final tally as 24 aye, 32 no, with six members excused; the clerk then declared Senate File 126 indefinitely postponed. With the postponement, the bill will not advance this session unless revived by future motion or a change in circumstance.
Details from the hearing that may inform future action: supporters and members repeatedly referenced the school's historic student capacity (about 200 students at full enrollment), recent declines in on‑campus student‑teacher placements, and an estimated need for major building renovation (figures cited in debate included $20,000,000 as an order‑of‑magnitude estimate mentioned by members). Several speakers called for pursuing alternatives such as a charter conversion or a management audit of university oversight if the Legislature does not enact the bill.
Having been postponed, the bill's sponsors and opponents said they expect continued follow‑up conversations among the university, the local district and legislative committees.

