Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Boards Commissions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council updates municipal code for boards and commissions, tightens eligibility and meeting minimums
Summary
An ordinance to update the Palm Desert Municipal Code concerning boards, commissions, committees and task forces passed with a 4-1 vote after debate over meeting frequencies and residency/employee eligibility language.
Palm Desert council adopted ordinance changes to the municipal code governing the city's boards, commissions, committees and task forces, adjusting meeting-frequency minimums, clarifying committee purposes and adding an eligibility waiting period for relatives of city employees and officials.
The ordinance incorporates recommendations from the council subcommittee on boards and commissions and standardizes most committees at seven members. It includes a provision establishing a 12-month ineligibility period after an employee's separation for relatives of city employees and officials; council members discovered during the hearing that the redlined draft could be read as applying the 12-month bar only to relatives and not to former employees themselves, and staff agreed to clarify the language for second reading.
The changes also set minimum meeting frequencies for many advisory bodies (for example, moving some committees from monthly to every-other-month or quarterly minimums) and define administrative procedures for special meetings. The revision treats boards and commissions that exercise final approval authority differently from advisory committees and task forces.
The Resource Preservation and Enhancement Committee (RPEC) and other committee members spoke during public comment to object to reductions to meeting frequency for some committees. RPEC chair Verlinda Blackburn and member Donald Ziegler told council they and their committee had been actively engaged and that the proposed change would diminish the committee's capacity to advise effectively.
Council debated specific committee frequencies and oversight roles. One council member proposed preserving a monthly public safety committee meeting and folding the homelessness task force into that committee; that substitute motion did not receive a second. After discussion and a separate procedural clarification, the ordinance passed on the vote 4-1, with Council member Quintanilla recorded as the sole dissent.
Council directed staff to clarify the employee/relative eligibility language for the required second reading and to maintain special-meeting provisions (including a 24-hour Brown Act special-meeting minimum) while noting that staff typically provides more notice in practice.
