Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Refuse Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public Works seeks $15 million to replace 3,000 street trash cans, citing durability and rodent resistance
Summary
San Francisco Public Works asked the Refuse Rate Board to release $15 million in reserves to buy 3,000 new, tamper- and rodent-resistant street receptacles, roll out sensors and rolling liners, and fund installation over three years; rollout and procurement details were discussed at the Feb. 27 Public Works Commission meeting.
San Francisco Public Works Director Carla Short told the Public Works Commission on Feb. 27 that the department has proposed tapping $15,000,000 in refuse rate reserves to buy a “new generation” of street trash cans designed to withstand heavy use, resist rummaging, be rodent resistant and be “sensor ready.”
Short said the department is seeking a not-to-exceed $9,000,000 procurement to acquire roughly 3,000 new cans, with approximately $6,000,000 set aside for installation. She described a planned rollout of 500 cans in year one, 1,000 in year two and 1,500 in year three, and estimated the per-unit purchase price at about $3,000 — similar to some existing models and higher than square cement cans priced at about $1,800.
The request to use refuse rate reserves, Short said, would not raise residential refuse rates or use the city’s general fund. She told commissioners the reserves built up during COVID when some funds set aside for labor were not spent.
Short described a 2022 pilot across 52 high‑demand locations that tested seven models, including four off‑the‑shelf and three custom designs; the pilot and feedback led staff to favor a custom slim‑silhouette design with a larger opening, stronger lock and ability to accept rolling liners to ease servicing by Recology crews.
The procurement plan calls for a request for proposals the following month and a “not to exceed” award around $9,000,000. Short said the department is asking Recology to build service responsiveness into its rate request, and noted that about 800 cans in the city already have fullness sensors.
Commissioners pressed on related enforcement and service strategies. Commissioner Zabe asked how Public Works addresses illegal dumping around cans; Short said outreach and enforcement crews may open bags for identifying information and work with the Department of the Environment and Recology to verify whether a building has sufficient residential service. Short added that when buildings lack service, Public Works can contact property owners and issues citations if service is not corrected.
Commissioner Bloom asked about cans adjacent to parks; Short said Rec and Park is responsible for cans inside parks but that Public Works’ inventory includes many cans adjacent to parks and that sensor capability and flexible service standards are part of the plan to improve responsiveness on high‑use days.
Short said the refuse rate board held an initial hearing on the request; the board will hold two more hearings before a final decision.
Clarifying details from Short’s presentation included the pilot scope and outcomes, a comparison of per‑unit costs among different can types and the plan for rolling liners and sensor readiness. Short repeatedly cautioned there is no “perfect” trash can and that vandalism and misuse will continue to occur.
Public comment on the item was opened and there were no callers recorded in the meeting transcript.
