Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislation Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee adopts watershed financial plan; two bills held for revision
Summary
The Prince George’s County Transportation committee on Feb. 20 adopted CR7-2025 (financial assurance plan for watershed protection) and voted to hold CB3-2025 and CB4-2025 for further revision and consultation with administration staff.
The Transportation, Infrastructure, Energy and Environment Committee considered three legislative items on Feb. 20 and recorded the following outcomes.
CR7-2025 — Financial assurance plan (Adopted): The committee voted to adopt the county’s biannual financial assurance plan required by the state for MS4 (NPDES Phase I municipal separate storm sewer system) permit compliance. The measure commits the county to projects and spending planned for fiscal years 2025–26 and updates the five-year revenue/cost projections submitted to the state. The committee approved the resolution by roll call, 4–0. The motion to approve was made by Council member Dena Fisher and seconded by Council member Genoga; the roll call recorded Chair Olsen, Council members Burrows, De Nogue and Fisher voting aye. Staff briefing materials cited projected impervious-surface restoration of about 1,709 acres at an estimated cost of roughly $85.3 million for FY25–26 and described larger seven-year operating and capital projections in committee attachments.
CB3-2025 — Office of Permitting Ombudsman (Held): The committee moved to hold CB3-2025 for further work; the motion carried 3–0. Committee members said no public commenters were present for this item and requested additional review before next legislative action.
CB4-2025 — Utility trailer parking restrictions (Held): The committee moved to hold CB4-2025 after administration staff identified multiple drafting and enforcement concerns. The bill would have defined “utility trailer,” set parking hours and short-term limits, required identifying information and established penalties; committee members and administration staff asked for revisions on scope, alignment with existing code sections, notification procedures and enforcement authority. The motion to hold carried 4–0.
The committee asked staff to coordinate follow-up discussions on CB4 with the county attorney, revenue authority and impacted departments and to return revised language at a future meeting.
