Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Medicaid Eligibility Automation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Medicaid director urges automation of eligibility, warns 90/10 federal match is conditional
Summary
Nevada Medicaid officials told lawmakers the governor's budget would move eligibility work into a proposed Nevada Health Authority and automate enrollment through Nevada Health Link, seeking a 90/10 federal match but noting CMS approvals and rebate accounting remain unresolved.
Administrator Stacy Weeks of the Division of Health Care Financing and Policy told the Assembly Ways and Means subcommittee that the governor's budget would transfer some eligibility functions to the proposed Nevada Health Authority and pursue automated, real-time enrollment through the state's exchange, Nevada Health Link.
Weeks said the administration is pursuing a 90/10 federal match for the technology work but that formal federal approval requires an Advance Planning Document (APD) and other CMS sign-offs. "We have had informal discussions with CMS officers on this, and it would be eligible, but we have to go through a very long process called an APD application," Weeks said.
The proposal would shift staff and responsibilities into a new eligibility policy team under the Medicaid director and add vendor and project-management resources to enable automated MAGI (Modified Adjusted Gross Income) determinations. Weeks said the approach is intended to reduce manual caseworker workload and increase automated ex parte renewals: "When we look at who is MAGI ... MAGI is about 90% of the population. Our ex parte rate, which is automated or sort of trying to do automated today, is also high. So, we anticipate anywhere between 80 to 90% of the population could be, going to the system." (Administrator Stacy Weeks)
Why it matters: The proposed automation is a major program change with large technical and fiscal implications. Weeks cautioned that if CMS does not approve the requested 90/10 match for technology, the state's general fund exposure would rise. "If it is technology, yes ... we would all be back here, I think, looking at our entire budget," she said.
Key budget and caseload figures the division presented: biennial Medicaid spending about $15.8 billion; federal share roughly 60% (projected to be about 59% by the end of the next biennium); current Medicaid enrollment at about 788,000 and expected to be near 800,000 by the end of the biennium; the general fund portion of last biennium's Medicaid spend about $2.5 billion. Weeks also noted an error in an earlier table that should have read $15,000,000,000 for the biannual spend.
Questions from lawmakers focused on funding risk and transitional staffing. Several members sought written follow-ups on whether the state can sustain existing vendor contracts (Gainwell, Deloitte and others named in discussion) if the 90/10 match is denied. Weeks said the administration will provide more detail to the committee.
What lawmakers asked to see next: a) a clear account of how pharmacy rebate savings would be used in the near term without violating federal holdbacks; b) the APD status and timeline for CMS approval of the 90/10 match; c) actuarial detail showing projected general-fund exposure if the higher match is not granted.
Ending: Weeks told the committee the Administration will return with technical adjustments and additional modeling: "What we could do is take in the meantime, put together the numbers for you and show you what we have, and we can talk about if there are things that need to be taken out." (Administrator Stacy Weeks)
