Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Mixed views as commission forwards 70 Encina PHZ rezoning to council; owners, shopping‑center operator debate future of Town & Country north lot

2416951 · February 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission split on whether to recommend approval of a planned community rezoning and three‑story, 10‑unit project at 70 Encina Avenue; after debate and public comment the commission voted 5-1 to forward the item to City Council with a split recommendation and additional directions for staff and the applicant.

The Planning & Transportation Commission voted to forward a planned community rezoning request for 70 Encina Avenue to the City Council on a split recommendation after a contentious public hearing that included opposition from Town & Country Village’s owner and legal challenges raised by a neighborhood commenter.

Staff planner Emily Callas outlined the PHZ (planned home zoning/planned community) application for a three‑story, 19,035‑square‑foot building containing ten condominium units and attached garages. Callas said the project was processed as a PHZ request that would allow departures from the CC‑2 standards, and that it was being reviewed under CEQA Guideline 15183 (consistency with an applicable plan and its certified EIR). "This project was streamlined under CEQA guideline 15183," Callas said, and staff recommended the commission recommend approval to council subject to conditions.

Project and benefits: The applicant’s architect, Jeffrey Galbraith of Hays Group Architects, and proponent Ed Storm (Stormland Development) described design changes made since prior hearings: removal of curb “bulb‑outs” originally proposed on Encina, modified courtyard and landscaping, and a reduced visual profile toward the adjacent shopping center parking lot. The project proposes two deed‑restricted below‑market units (two units, approximately 20% of the project) provided at affordability levels the applicant and staff described as within…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans