Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Critical Area Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves minor Board of Appeals change before submitting critical-area ordinance to state commission
Summary
The Chesapeake Beach Planning & Zoning Commission voted to approve a staff-requested wording change shifting a Board of Appeals provision from "procedures" to "standards" before the town submits its recently adopted critical-area ordinance to the Critical Area Commission for review and comments to ensure state-law compliance.
The Chesapeake Beach Planning & Zoning Commission on Feb. 26 approved a staff recommendation to move a statement from the ordinance’s Board of Appeals procedures into the standards section and to forward the town’s adopted critical-area ordinance to the Maryland Critical Area Commission for review.
Planner Miss Franklin told the commission the move is to address items the commission identified during adoption and to comply with a new state law that took effect after the town adopted the ordinance. "They are gonna need us to make changes to comply with that new law," Franklin said. She said the Critical Area Commission will return written edits the town must adopt to reach compliance.
Why it matters: the changes are procedural and textual but are required to align the town’s ordinance with state requirements enacted after the ordinance’s adoption. The commission’s action lets staff submit the document so the state commission can identify precise wording changes the town should make.
Franklin said the Critical Area Commission may also request that material currently in separate sections — violations, the Board of Appeals provision and overlay standards — be repeated or consolidated in the zoning ordinance. She also said the Critical Area Commission asked that one statement currently under “procedures” be treated as a standard and moved accordingly; the commission approved that specific edit.
The commission made a motion and voted "Aye" on the change; no roll-call vote with names was recorded in the meeting transcript. After the vote the commission directed staff to submit the ordinance package to the Critical Area Commission and to return any required edits for further review by the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Planner Franklin summarized next steps: submit, receive the Critical Area Commission’s required text edits to comply with the state law, and return the revised ordinance to the commission for review. The commission did not adopt additional substantive changes at the Feb. 26 meeting.
The critical-area submission is administrative but time-sensitive because the town needs to meet state law requirements; staff will report back when the state returns its comments.
