Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Utility Movement Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public hearing held on bill to exempt electric utility equipment from some oversized permits
Summary
House Bill 323 would amend Section 32-9-29 to exempt electric utility commodities from oversized-movement permitting requirements similar to agricultural exemptions; the committee held a public hearing with ALDOT and utility industry testimony but took no vote.
The Transportation, Utilities and Infrastructure committee held a public hearing on House Bill 323, which would amend Section 32-9-29 to exempt electric utility commodities from oversized-movement permitting requirements on the state highway system.
"Safety is their number 1 with all these utilities," Representative Givens said in introducing the bill, adding that the proposal seeks parity with agricultural exemptions and does not ask for higher weight limits. "So house bill 3 23... is to exempt electric utility commodities from the requirement of obtaining oversized permit for movement on the state highway system," he said.
Representatives of the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) and the electric industry testified. George Connor, deputy director for operations with ALDOT, told the committee the agency already issues annual permits for many utility moves and said the bill, as drafted, is "both, in our opinion, unnecessary for reasons I'll explain, and it does create situations that will lead to unintended unsafe conditions." Connor explained annual permits allow 24/7 movement for combinations under certain size thresholds and let ALDOT route large loads to avoid bridges or constrained lanes.
Blake Hardwick, executive director of the Energy Institute of Alabama, said the institute's members "come in support of this bill" and described industry confusion about permitting and recent tickets issued to utility drivers. Hardwick said the industry was told an annual permit option was not available until recent conversations with ALDOT and urged clearer rules so drivers in emergency restoration situations are not penalized.
ALDOT staff acknowledged industry confusion and described current operational practices. A senior ALDOT official said annual permits are available on request and that, for after-hours emergency moves, ALDOT operators can issue verbal approval and follow up with paperwork; the agency also routes permitted moves to avoid unsafe bridges or construction zones. "We issue over 600,000 permits a year across the state for all users," one ALDOT presenter told the committee, describing the agency's permit-processing capacity.
Testimony addressed practical problems in emergencies: utility crews moving transformers after storms, drivers without printers to carry hard-copy permits, and law-enforcement officers unfamiliar with permit processes. Panelists suggested ALDOT could provide electronic confirmations as a field-accessible alternative to hard-copy permits.
Committee members asked operational questions about how after-hours approvals are recorded and how ALDOT ensures information is passed between on-call staff. ALDOT staff said on-call operators handle emergency moves and that supervisory handoffs occur when staff change shifts. The committee scheduled further action: staff will circulate a notice and the committee will reconvene to vote on the bill at a later date.
The public hearing produced no committee vote; committee members agreed to meet again to consider the bill after follow-up information and coordination with ALDOT and industry stakeholders.
