Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emergency Recovery topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City Council asks for detailed reports on emergency recovery contract and funding
Summary
Councilmembers asked the Emergency Management Department for contract terms, costs and funding sources for an emergency recovery contract that Council members say should not exceed $10 million; staff were directed to provide reports to committee and to the Council.
The Los Angeles City Council on Feb. 26 asked the Emergency Management Department (EMD) for detailed reports on a recovery contract and its funding sources, including whether FEMA reimbursement will apply.
Councilmember Bob Blumenfield (note: transcript label: "Concejal Park") and Councilmember Kevin de León (note: transcript label: "Concejal Rodríguez") discussed the contract during a briefing on recovery operations. Councilmember Park asked for the contract cost, term and funding source and said, “Como lo entiendo, ese contrato tiene, no debe de exceder más de diez millones.”
Councilmember Rodríguez said he had introduced a motion asking EMD to produce reports and to present the contract to the Council so members could understand the work and operational plans. “Solamente introduje la moción este mes para pedir reportes de EMD y además para presentar el contrato para el concejo, para que podamos todos entender la el trabajo que tenemos y las planes de operaciones,” Rodríguez said.
Speakers on the dais said the Department of Water and Power had also retained a contract for related services in an area similar to the EMD work, and members emphasized the need to coordinate recovery efforts to avoid duplicative costs for the same impacted taxpayers.
There was no final Council vote recorded in the public transcript on contracting authority; instead, Councilmembers requested written reports and that committee briefings include copies of the executed contract and details on funding and FEMA reimburseability.
The Council’s request directs staff to provide the requested documentation to the committee and the full Council so members can review the contract terms, spending authority, and any anticipated outside reimbursements. The Council discussion indicated concern about maximizing public funds and avoiding separate or overlapping recovery contracts that would duplicate taxpayer expense.
Looking ahead, staff said they would circulate the contract and related materials to the Council and committee; the transcript records the council asking for follow-up reports but does not record a formal vote adopting a specific contract action.
