Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Committee hears lengthy debate on anti‑SLAPP measure; sponsors and critics seek more study

2405772 · February 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 223, an anti‑SLAPP (strategic‑lawsuit‑against‑public‑participation) bill intended to create a qualified‑immunity procedure for First Amendment activities, drew extensive testimony and questions; the Senate Judiciary Committee did not advance the bill and the chair urged further review.

The Wyoming Senate Judiciary Committee heard extended testimony on House Bill 223, a proposed anti‑SLAPP statute that would create a qualified‑immunity procedure for First Amendment activities, allow early dismissal of meritless suits, and provide a cause of action and fee recovery in Wyoming when a citizen is sued in another jurisdiction that lacks comparable protections.

Sponsor Representative Aument introduced the bill and said it was designed to protect residents' constitutional rights and to prevent abusive litigation that punishes speech through the cost and burden of lawsuits. "Strategic lawsuit against public participation or SLAPP suit is abusive litigation where a plaintiff brings a legally questionable claim in order to punish the defendant for exercising his or her First Amendment rights," Representative Aument said.

Attorney Jessie Rubino, who assisted the sponsor, told the…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans