Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bond Elections Language topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee rewrites bond-question language oversight, allows judge discretion in challenges
Summary
The committee approved changes to House Bill 190 to require 'true and impartial' ballot language and shift rulemaking authority to the Secretary of State; it also amended language so courts 'may' stay bond challenges rather than 'shall' prevent issuance during litigation.
The Senate Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions Committee approved amendments to House Bill 190 to strengthen requirements that municipal and county bond-question language be ‘‘true and impartial’’ and to broaden the secretary of state's rulemaking authority over bond-election language.
Representative Jamie Lee (House District 38) described ballot language she reviewed from Casper’s 2024 bond propositions and urged language that avoids ‘‘heartstring’’ appeals. Secretary of State Chuck Gray supported the bill, saying adjectives in ballot language can be improper and that statewide oversight would bring consistency. Gray said some counties have not routinely allowed the secretary of state to review proofs before printing.
Committee members debated how to prevent frivolous lawsuits from halting bond funding if a challenge is filed. After discussion the committee rewrote the sentence about rulemaking to read that "the secretary of state may promulgate reasonable rules for conducting bond elections and bond-language for bond elections." The committee also changed the enforcement sentence so a court may stay a bond challenge pending resolution of civil action, rather than automatically preventing bond issuance until litigation concludes.
County clerks’ association president Malcolm Irvin and clerk Mary Langford testified about administrative constraints and suggested modest drafting changes so proclamation language and certifications align with multiple election dates. Public commenters, including Gail Simmons (Civics 307/Why Vote?) and others, urged tightening criteria for "true and impartial" language and warned that a civil-cause-of-action without guardrails could let a single plaintiff delay bond collection.
On a roll call the committee reported five ayes and zero noes on the engrossed and amended bill and advanced HB190. The committee asked the sponsor to work with the secretary of state and clerks to finalize rule language and to clarify timing for review of local bond-question proofs.
