Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sponsorship Requirement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee delays vote on changing sponsorship requirement for resolutions
Summary
The Rules Committee postponed consideration of a proposal to reduce the sponsor requirement for resolutions from two sponsors to one until Commissioner Michaels can present the measure.
The Blount County Commission Rules Committee on Feb. 25 postponed action on a proposal to change the sponsor requirement for resolutions and deferred the item until Commissioner Michaels is present to make the case.
The item under consideration would have struck an existing requirement that a resolution have at least two sponsors and replaced it with a requirement to list at least one sponsor name on the heading or signature page, while keeping a requirement that at least one sponsor be present. The nut graf: proponents and opponents indicated the rule was introduced in a prior term for a reason, and committee members agreed the sponsoring commissioner should be present but differed on whether the two‑sponsor requirement should remain.
Commissioner French said he would not support reducing the sponsor requirement, citing the original purpose of the rule. Committee members agreed it would be prudent to postpone the issue until Commissioner Michaels — who had requested the change — could attend and present the rationale. One member moved to postpone and another seconded; the committee agreed to move the item to the next rules‑committee meeting.
The item will return to the committee agenda when Commissioner Michaels is available to discuss the proposed change.
