Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ballot Language topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Missouri Senate gives preliminary approval to bill changing ballot-summary rules
Summary
The Missouri Senate gave preliminary approval to Senate Bill 22, a measure that would change how summary statements prepared by the Missouri General Assembly for ballot measures are handled, including a provision described as a three-attempt or "three-strike" rule for the secretary of state.
Get email alerts on the Ballot Language topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
On Tuesday afternoon, the Missouri Senate gave preliminary approval to Senate Bill 22, a proposal that would create new provisions governing the treatment of summary statements prepared by the Missouri General Assembly for ballot measures. Senator Rick Bratton of Harrisonville is the bill sponsor.
The bill would alter how summary statements for ballot measures are prepared and reviewed. During floor discussion senators described a provision that would allow up to three attempts — characterized in debate as a "three-strike" or three-attempt rule — for the office of the secretary of state to respond or comply with the new provisions. Senate Minority Floor Leader Doug Beck of Afton said senators "worked together on this compromise." He also said the measure would give the secretary of state an opportunity to weigh in while preserving the rights of parties to seek relief in court.
Senate Bill 22 was described on the floor as having received preliminary Senate approval. According to the discussion recorded on the floor, another positive vote would send the proposal to the Missouri House of Representatives for similar consideration. The transcript did not specify a final vote tally, a mover or a seconder for the motion, or the specific statutory language that would change.
Supporters on the floor framed the proposal as a compromise intended to define the interaction between the legislature's summary statements and the secretary of state's role; critics and detailed concerns were not recorded in the available excerpt. The transcript did not identify whether the measure would alter existing deadlines, the content standards for summaries, or how courts would review disputes beyond the general statement that parties would retain rights to seek judicial review.
Reporting from the state capital, Dean Morgan.

