Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation And Growth topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council delays decision on 21-lot county subdivision seeking city water and sewer; asks for 40-year water plan and impact-fee details
Summary
Petitioners asked Wellsville to provide water and sewer to a 21-lot clustered subdivision outside city limits. Council raised annexation, precedent and water-supply concerns and requested the city's 40-year water study and impact-fee calculations before further action.
Tony Nelson and a group of petitioners asked the Wellsville City Council on Feb. 5 for the option to connect 21 clustered lots outside the city limits to Wellsville's water and sewer. Petitioners said allowing city utilities would protect the aquifer by avoiding 20 new private wells and septic systems and would enable future coordinated growth; they also offered to construct the required infrastructure and to pay outside-customer charges.
Council members and staff raised multiple concerns. Council and residents discussed annexation "islands," precedent-setting (other outside properties might seek city service), and the city's leverage to require future annexation. Staff recalled prior legal advice that annexation and selling water outside city limits raise issues; council members asked how to ensure a future annexation would occur if sewer and water were extended to the unannexed parcels. The city noted state code allows sales of water outside city limits but that the city charges double rates for outside customers; council members said that price signal is intended to encourage annexation.
Other discussion topics: distance and cost to extend mains (petitioners estimated roughly 1,300 feet of main to reach the properties in one routing), required road and subdivision standards if city utilities are provided (council said county-spec roads would not be sufficient if the city later takes the subdivision), potential impact fees (staff said an impact fee estimate is approximately $10,000 per home under current code; if charged at "double" outside-city rates the fee could be roughly $20,000 per lot), and whether the city's 40-year water plan supports additional hookups.
Outcome: the council voted to continue the matter and asked staff to provide the city's 40-year water plan, clarify legal options for conditioning service on future annexation or right-of-first-refusal agreements for tank siting, and estimate impact fees and other requirements. The council noted a county deadline (March 6) on the petitioners' process and requested staff expedite the information but recognized a full 40-year study may take longer.
Ending: Staff will assemble the 40-year water plan, impact-fee estimates and recommended conditions and return the item to council for further action.
