Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Outdoor Recreation Grant topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Daggett County approves $200,000 planning and engineering grant for Lucerne area

2392885 · January 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Daggett County Commission approved a $200,000 Outdoor Recreation Initiative planning and engineering grant for work at the Lucerne area marina; the grant requires no county match and drew discussion about federal stewardship and local safety concerns.

Daggett County commissioners approved a $200,000 Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) grant on a voice vote to fund planning and engineering work for the Lucerne area marina.

The motion to approve the award — described in the meeting record as a planning and engineering grant for “Lucerne Marine” — was made and seconded during discussion of agenda item 11. Commissioners said the grant requires no county match and said county involvement will be limited to hiring an engineer to complete the planning work, rather than the county managing multiple contractors.

Commissioners and other participants discussed how the engineering amount compares with typical engineering shares of total project costs. One participant described engineering as commonly representing roughly 10–14% of a project and said that at $200,000 that would imply a planning/design phase tied to a roughly $2 million project; another participant said the project could be closer to $3.5 million, which would lower the engineering percentage. The meeting record does not state a confirmed total project budget.

Speakers also raised concerns about property stewardship by the federal U.S. Forest Service. Several commissioners and participants said the county is pursuing work because federal stewardship and maintenance at the site have been insufficient, and the county does not expect to be the primary long-term manager.

A resident who described frequent use of the dock said maintenance issues had created safety hazards; she recounted that her husband tripped when stepping onto a temporary plywood board and said other people had also fallen at the site. That anecdote was offered during discussion and was not accompanied by any formal incident report in the meeting record.

After discussion the commission approved the motion by voice vote. The meeting record shows commissioners answering “Aye” and the chair moving to the next agenda item.

The record gives the grant amount and that no county match is required; it does not specify which engineering firm was selected, the full expected project budget, a construction timeline, or permit approvals required from other agencies.