Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Valley Center board approves preliminary plat for KWH Investments for land southeast of Interurban Drive and West 90 Third Street

2392261 · February 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Valley Center Planning and Zoning Board voted to approve SD 20 25 0 1, a preliminary plat application from KWH Investments LLC for nine lots located southeast of Interurban Drive and West 90 Third Street in Sedgwick County, after staff recommendations and no public opposition.

The Valley Center Planning and Zoning Board voted Feb. 25 to approve SD 20 25 0 1, an application by KWH Investments LLC seeking preliminary plat approval for land southeast of the intersection of Interurban Drive and West 90 Third Street in Sedgwick County.

Board members heard city staff update that all nine lots in the proposed plat lie in Sedgwick County rather than inside city limits but remain within the city’s area of influence. City planning staff said the board’s review was still required because the parcels fall inside that area of influence. Staff also highlighted the need to provide easements "on the back of those Northwells," a matter the board noted as one of the principal outstanding details.

No members of the public spoke in opposition during the hearing. After the public comment period closed, a board member moved to approve the preliminary plat “based on city staff recommendations, public comments, and discussion by the planning and zoning board,” the motion was seconded, and the board approved the application by voice vote with no opposing votes recorded.

The approval keeps the plat moving forward under the conditions discussed in the hearing record, including provision of the easements identified by staff. The board did not record a roll-call vote or enumerate conditions beyond those noted in staff recommendations during the meeting.

The board’s action resolves an item that had been tabled at the Jan. 28 meeting and returns the matter to the review process between city staff, the applicant, and Sedgwick County for any county-level approvals that may be required.