Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environment Restoration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council authorizes $123,400 monitoring contract for Upper York Creek restoration years 5–6
Summary
The Saint Helena City Council authorized a $123,400 monitoring contract with Napa County Resource Conservation District for years 5–6 of the Upper York Creek ecosystem restoration project.
The Saint Helena City Council on Feb. 25 authorized the city manager to execute a professional services agreement with the Napa County Resource Conservation District (Napa RCD) for monitoring the Upper York Creek ecosystem restoration project in an amount not to exceed $123,400 for project years 5 and 6.
City staff explained the city’s permits require a 10-year monitoring and reporting program on vegetation, wildlife, sediment transport and other post-dam-removal metrics. Mr. Leach, who presented the item, said Napa RCD performs field surveys and compiles annual reports required by the funding and regulatory agencies and that years 5–6 had not been budgeted. Leach told the council the timing of the agenda item was "perfect" because city staff met those same agencies — the regional water board, NOAA and California Department of Fish and Wildlife — earlier that day to discuss ongoing reporting.
Leach said Napa RCD was finishing a late year‑4 report and that the city is discussing with regulators whether the monitoring schedule could be adjusted (for example, focusing surveys in later years after significant storm events) to reduce cost and meet permit obligations. He said Napa RCD would propose an approach in coordination with staff and regulators.
Resident Elaine DeMan, who pulled the item for discussion, told the council she supported the contract and described the restored area as valuable habitat that draws visitors and scientific interest: "I think this is really money well spent for the future of Saint Helena," she said.
The clerk recorded a unanimous roll-call vote: Council member Barrick, Council member Spatarotto, Vice Mayor Deasy and Mayor Paul Doreen all voted yes.
Why it matters: The monitoring is a regulatory obligation tied to permits and funding conditions; ongoing monitoring influences both compliance with regulatory agencies and future management decisions for the restored ecosystem. Staff said a longer-term negotiation with regulators may reduce the frequency or timing of field surveys while preserving permit compliance.
Ending: Staff will execute the contract for years 5–6, continue discussions with regulators about monitoring frequency and return to council with funding options or alternatives as needed.
