Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Access Pet Friendly topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill to require landlords to publish pet policies aims to keep tenants and pets together, advocates say
Summary
HB1152 would require rental-property listings and property websites to state pet policies and provide written copies in rental applications; animal-welfare groups testified that clearer disclosure will reduce owner surrenders and shelter intake and ease searches for pet-owning renters.
Get email alerts on the Housing Access Pet Friendly topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Speaker: Delegate Stein introduced HB 11 52, the Pet Policy Transparency Act, which would require rental listings and property websites to disclose whether units accept pets and to provide a written copy of the property’s pet policy with the rental application.
“Nearly 3 quarters of renters have pets but rental housing that's affordable and will accept pets is hard to find,” Stein said, describing research his office and witnesses cited showing many affordable-unit listings do not disclose pet rules. He said the bill’s goal is transparency—making it easier for pet-owning renters to identify suitable housing and reducing the number of animals surrendered to shelters.
Animal-welfare organizations (The Humane Society/“Humane World for Animals,” Maryland SPCA, PAWS/professional animal workers) and advocacy groups testified in favor. Stacy Velodin (Humane World for Animals) said a review of 400 affordable listings found just 67 that cited a pet policy and many required a phone call to confirm; shelters are at capacity and clearer disclosure would reduce unnecessary surrenders, proponents said.
Some committee members asked about the operational burden for small landlords without websites; supporters said the requirement can be met with a simple printed policy or a posted QR code and that sponsors are open to clarifying language to avoid punishing small-scale landlords. The committee heard no opposition testimony that would block the bill; the hearing concluded with advocates urging a favorable report.

