Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bail Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nevada bill would let prosecutors, defense agree to use bail for restitution before exoneration
Summary
A hearing on Senate Bill 13 clarified an amendment to allow defense and prosecution to stipulate that bail be applied to restitution or other monetary penalties before a court exonerates bail, intended to streamline plea negotiations; no public testimony was received and no vote was taken.
Assistant Court Administrator John McCormick told the Senate Judiciary Committee that Senate Bill 13 would allow defense and prosecution in criminal matters to “stipulate to a disposition of bail different than exoneration,” and that the committee received an amendment to restore the bill’s original placement of that language.
The change aims to let parties agree, before bail is exonerated, that posted bail can be applied to restitution or other monetary penalties arising from a plea agreement rather than returned to the payor. McCormick said the amendment moves the stipulation up in the statutory sequence so the court does not need to exonerate bail before the agreed use occurs.
Committee members asked whether the bill would expand or restrict current uses of bail. McCormick answered it would not change the types of uses already permitted; it only codifies that the parties can agree to those uses before exoneration and thus avoid procedural delay.
No members of the public offered support, opposition, or neutral testimony in person or by phone during the hearing. The committee closed the hearing on SB 13 after McCormick concluded his presentation.
The bill, as described at the hearing, focuses narrowly on the timing and recording of a bail stipulation in plea negotiations; it does not change the substantive list of allowable uses of bail, according to the presenter.
