Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Commercial Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Polaris-area owners object as board approves small parking variance for Lauer Drive redevelopment
Summary
The Board approved a five-space parking variance to allow a 29,370-square-foot retail building at 8701 Lauer Drive to be reclassified and partially repurposed as a commercial center; Polaris neighborhood representatives said the reduced standard and lack of use restrictions raise long-term parking and hours-of-operation concerns.
The Columbus zoning board on Feb. 25 approved a request to reclassify and slightly expand an existing retail building at 8701 Lauer Drive into a commercial center that will include retail, a food court and drinking/eating establishments, granting a variance for five fewer parking spaces than would otherwise be required.
Carmela Babu Maganti, an owner of the property, told the Board the redevelopment was already planned and that the project team sought a variance for 5 parking spaces to accommodate an added mezzanine and expanded interior program. “We have been approved from a city as a commercial center,” she said, and described ongoing coordination with the Polaris Owners Association.
Franz Geiger, president of the Polaris Owners Association, urged caution. He told the Board the association had not received clear information about the mix of uses and expressed concern that calling the site a “commercial center” reduced the parking requirement compared with traditional retail zoning. “We believe, with the uncertainty of the uses ... we would need well over 107 spaces,” Geiger said, warning that the proposal lacked restrictions on uses and hours that could generate spillover parking impacts.
Planning staff told the Board the proposal met city design guidelines and that the requested parking reduction amounts to five spaces given the modest addition; Traffic Management raised no comments. Staff and the Far North Columbus Communities Coalition recommended approval.
Board members considered the zoning factors — including whether the property could yield reasonable return without the variance, whether the variance was substantial, and whether the neighborhood character would be altered — and approved the variance. The chair and multiple members said the reduction appeared minor and consistent with redevelopment goals.
What happened next: the Board approved the variance, and staff said standard permitting and building-permit review will determine final occupancy and any required conditions. Geiger asked that the owner continue to present to the neighborhood design-review body and to add use or hours clarifications if needed; the owner said she had worked with neighborhood groups and would continue to coordinate.
Why it matters: The vote illustrates a recurring tension in redevelopment near Polaris: city staff and the board cited redevelopment and design policy goals, while neighborhood organizations want clearer limits on uses and assurance parking will be adequate to avoid spillover onto nearby streets.
