Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Broadband topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves $2 million MOU with Hello Fiber to support BEAD application amid map concerns
Summary
The board approved a memorandum of understanding committing $2,000,000 in matching funds to Hello Fiber (ALLO) for a BEAD grant application after extended questioning about coverage maps and whether the award could create uncovered "pockets." The vote was 2–1.
The Cochise County Board of Supervisors voted 2–1 to approve a memorandum of understanding (MOU) committing $2,000,000 in matching funds to Hello Fiber (ALLO) to support the company’s application for Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment (BEAD) program funding administered by the Arizona Commerce Authority.
County staff said the MOU derives from an earlier county request-for-information that solicited proposals to use up to $5 million in local matching funds; timing and other constraints left $2 million available. County staff told supervisors the county invited proposals and evaluated submissions on several criteria, including the proposer’s willingness to reach a large portion of the county and minimize "cherry‑picking." The county awarded the local match offer to ALLO after evaluating multiple proposals.
Supervisors and staff spent extensive time on the record addressing constituent concerns about coverage maps used to determine BEAD eligibility. Several supervisors asked whether areas depicted as “served” on older maps may actually lack active broadband because a provider has received federal funding or loans to build but has not yet completed deployment. Staff said eligibility for BEAD is tied to federal and state mapping and funding commitments: some areas that currently lack service were excluded because federal funds or loans already had been committed to another provider; those providers have a time window to complete buildout.
Supervisor questions centered on whether the county’s matching commitment to Hello Fiber could create isolated unserved pockets inside other providers’ funded footprints, and whether other local providers had been able to bid for the county’s RFI. Staff replied the RFI was open to all providers, multiple firms responded, and ALLO’s proposal scored highest based on the county criteria. Staff also said companies that received federal awards remain responsible for their allocated builds and that BEAD eligibility follows NTIA/state guidance and maps.
Board members noted time sensitivity: the state BEAD application deadlines were imminent. Staff warned that county ARPA funds were not used because of timing and obligation rules; the available $2 million came from local government and tribal consistency funds. County staff said providers could still file BEAD applications without the county match but that the match could strengthen ALLO’s application.
Supervisor Crosby moved to approve the MOU and argued the match would help expand county broadband quickly; one supervisor voted no. The motion passed 2–1. The board did not specify additional conditions for the MOU on the record. Staff said they would continue outreach and coordination with providers and the state regarding mapping and build schedules.
