Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Dark Sky Indigenous Naming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Reviewers urge clearer policies on dark‑sky protections and Indigenous place names in county plan
Summary
Advisory members asked Coconino County planners to clarify dark‑sky protections, balance safety concerns, and add policy language to support Indigenous naming and interpretive signage.
Get email alerts on the Dark Sky Indigenous Naming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During a review of the comprehensive‑plan chapters on parks, open space and community character, advisory members and staff discussed dark‑sky protections, public safety concerns tied to lighting, and opportunities to add Indigenous place names and interpretive signage to county signage policy.
Staff told the group dark‑sky issues are already addressed in the community character chapter and by a county dark‑sky ordinance that was updated in recent years; the planning team did not add the item repeatedly to the parks and recreation chapter because it is covered elsewhere. One participant who serves on a dark‑sky coalition stressed that while dark skies are highly valued, planners should also acknowledge that some residents have safety concerns about reduced lighting.
Separately, members recommended adding a county policy encouraging use of Indigenous names for parks, trails and interpretive signage where appropriate. Staff said that policy would likely belong in the diversity, cultures and community character chapter and that additional conversations with county management and tribal partners will be needed before drafting any naming or renaming policy. Eric Stanfield of the Navajo Nation Heritage and Historic Preservation Department joined the meeting and staff said they will follow up with tribal leaders and county management on implementation and consultation for any naming or access policies.
Staff said they would convey the recommendation to county management for possible inclusion in a later draft and flagged the idea as a potential new policy that would require coordination across departments and consultation with Indigenous nations; no formal vote or final policy was adopted at the meeting.

