Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the County Finance Administration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mercer County Commission approves engineering contract, building remodel, tax abatements and other items

2364322 · February 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Mercer County commissioners voted to approve a range of administrative and budget items — including tax abatements for six parcels placed into federal trust, payment of a revised DOT‑closeout invoice, a $70,000 county shop remodel allocation and the selection of Moore Engineering as county engineer — and directed an independent audit of January payroll after errors appeared following a new software rollout.

Mercer County commissioners voted on a slate of administrative and budget items at their meeting, approving payments, a building remodel, tax abatements and the county engineering contract while directing an outside audit of January payroll.

The board voted 5-0 to approve six tax abatements for parcels placed into trust by a tribal conveyance, removing those parcels from the county tax rolls. The commission also approved a temporary-use permit renewal for a second dwelling used as rental housing, a routine planning-and-zoning item that has been reviewed previously.

On a previously tabled invoice from a firm handling interstate project closeout work, the county accepted a revised bill. The vendor applied a credit of $15,275 and presented a revised invoice for $16,308.10; the commission voted to pay the revised amount.

Commissioners approved a $70,000 allocation (estimated) to finish a remodel of a county shop entrance and relocate offices to make the space ADA-compliant. The funds had been budgeted previously and are to come from the highway department cash reserve.

After discussion and interviews with multiple firms, the commission awarded the county engineering contract to Moore Engineering; the motion passed with one commissioner voting no. The board discussed having a one-year contract term as part of the award.

Several governance and administrative motions also passed: an ID badge and key policy was adopted; a request from the sheriff to pay out unused vacation for two employees because of staffing during 2024 was approved; and the commission approved a duplicate warrant for a missed retirement check. The board also removed a prior moratorium on ore‑processing siting and directed that site applications be considered under existing ordinance rules.

Following widespread questions about January payroll calculations after the county’s new financial/payroll software rollout, commissioners voted to commission an external review of the January payroll and payroll/payables controls. The board directed an independent firm to perform a walk‑through of payroll and payables processing, assess controls, and recommend improvements; the county requested Tyler (software vendor) participation in the review.

Votes at a glance (selected items): - Tax abatements (six parcels): approved (recorded yes votes: Casey, Rick, Mark, Jamie, Jean). - Arlene Curti temporary-use permit (nonfarm dwelling rental): approved (unanimous). - Interstate engineering revised invoice, $16,308.10: approved (unanimous). - County shop remodel, estimated $70,000: approved (unanimous). - County engineer award: Moore Engineering approved (motion passed; one commissioner recorded a nay). - ID badge/key policy: adopted (unanimous). - Duplicate warrant 55152 (retirement check reissue): approved (unanimous after stop-payment procedure clarification). - Motion to commission an external audit of January payroll and review payroll/payables controls: approved (unanimous).

The commission handled these items in a single session that combined routine consent business with several items that generated sustained discussion (the engineering selection and the payroll/software issues). The minutes show commissioners asking for additional follow‑up on funding sources and contract terms in several cases. The board scheduled follow‑up and staff work where action items require implementation.