Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Economy Business Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House passes wide-ranging update to business and nonprofit entity code
Summary
The Alabama House approved House Bill 200, an Alabama Law Institute-sponsored update to the state's business and nonprofit entity code that codifies several doctrines, modifies LLC transfer rules at death and makes technical and procedural changes across chapters.
Get email alerts on the State Economy Business Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Alabama House of Representatives on the floor approved House Bill 200, an Alabama Law Institute measure updating the state's business and nonprofit entity code.
Representative Almond, the bill's sponsor, told colleagues the measure was a periodic, technical update produced by the Alabama Law Institute. "This is, a an ALI, Alabama Law Institute bill that updates our business code," Almond said, adding the bill contains "lots of technical changes and a few other additional changes." He described one substantive change in the limited liability company section: members could designate who receives a membership interest on death within their operating agreement so that transfer would no longer require probate. "You can actually now designate who gets your membership interest at death, and you don't have to probate a will to transfer that membership interest," Almond said.
The bill also codifies the common-law doctrine of independent legal significance in several code chapters, adds clarifying language to nonprofit and merger approval processes, and simplifies certain professional corporation procedures, Almond said. He told members the changes were largely clarifying or procedural: "Chapter 1, there's just some technical changes, no substantive changes ... Chapter 4 deals with Alabama professional corporations ... Chapter 5 a under the Alabama limited liability company law" and highlighted the probate avoidance change.
Members asked follow-up questions about applicability and interactions with existing case law. A representative from Jefferson County asked how codifying the doctrine of independent legal significance differs from prior codifications; Almond responded that the bill explicitly places that doctrine into the business code to make its application in transactions clearer. Another question sought specifics about the nonprofit and merger provisions; Almond said the bill provides a ratification process for documents not properly approved and clarifies approval and authorization practices.
The House first adopted the bill under a recorded vote and later approved final passage. The clerk recorded 102 ayes and 0 nays on an earlier procedural vote; later recorded final passage was shown in the transcript as 101 ayes and 0 nays and the bill was announced as passed. The bill sponsor and multiple members described the package as largely technical with a few owner-focused changes for LLCs and procedural clarifications for nonprofits and mergers.
The bill will proceed to the next steps in the legislative process for further consideration or enrollment as required by House procedure.

