Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Side Yard Parking Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Cheektowaga ZBA denies variance for covered parking pad at 67 Martinique

2353499 · February 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Cheektowaga Zoning Board of Appeals voted to deny a requested variance that would have allowed a covered parking pad to be located 1 foot from the property line at 67 Martinique Drive; the board found the proposal out of character with the neighborhood.

The Cheektowaga Zoning Board of Appeals voted to deny a variance requested by the owner of 67 Martinique Drive that would have allowed a covered parking pad and overhead canopy to be set one foot from the side property line instead of meeting minimum setback requirements.

The board said the proposal did not meet the town's zoning standards and was inconsistent with the character of the neighborhood. Motion to deny the variance passed unanimously.

Board members reviewed photographs of the property and discussed longstanding vehicle parking across lawns in the neighborhood. The applicant told the board the concrete pad “has always been there” and that the small vehicle is stored there in winter; the applicant said the trailer or vehicle would be moved soon. Board members and staff noted concerns with vehicles driving over lawn areas and said parking/storage in front of dwellings can violate town code when not on an approved pad or in a garage.

After discussion, the board concluded the submission did not justify an exception to the side-yard and parking requirements. The board’s rationale included neighborhood character and that similar structures in the area, while present, are not proof of compliance. The board invited the applicant to rework the plan and return if he wished.

Votes at the meeting recorded the motion to deny as approved. The board clerk recorded all votes as affirmative on the denial motion.