Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Airport authority reviews FY 2025–26 preliminary budget; no action taken

2352050 · February 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board received a first review of the Carson City Airport preliminary FY 2025–26 budget, discussed a projected drawdown for pavement preservation, and noted an accounting of interest income tied to the possible new lease; no formal vote was taken.

The Carson City Airport Authority on Feb. 19 reviewed its preliminary FY 2025–26 budget in a discussion-only session and did not take formal action. Staff and board members discussed projected expenses, accounting treatments and timing; the authority will have a second review before a preliminary approval and another opportunity prior to final adoption in May.

Treasurer Rogers and Airport Manager Corey Jenkins walked the board through the line-by-line review. The budget includes a large non-cash interest-income line tied to the net present value (NPV) calculation for potential new leases; staff said that number reflects an estimate should the south-side parcel currently out for bid be leased. “That’s not cash,” Treasurer Rogers said, adding the NPV shows how a new lease would be reported for budgetary purposes next year.

Staff projected the airport will spend more than it takes in on a cash basis next year to fund pavement preservation work: “We will end up with higher expenses than revenues to the tune of about $150,000 next year,” Rogers said, and staff said the airport has the cash to cover that planned maintenance. The preliminary budget also includes a 5% pay increase for all staff built into the numbers; if the board approves the final budget, the increase would become effective July 1.

Board members were asked to submit comments between meetings; staff said the budget will return to the authority for final review in May after state submission. No public comment was received on the budget at the Feb. 19 meeting.