Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
House hearing on HB 70 spotlights physician opposition to current electronic health records
Summary
Lawmakers heard competing views on HB 70, which would limit insurer use of electronic medical records (EMRs) for commercial prior authorization and protect small providers from mandatory EMR requirements; sponsors said the bill protects private practice while insurers warned it would impede claims processing.
Representative David Nagel, prime sponsor of HB 70, told the House Committee on Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs that the bill aims to curb harmful effects of current electronic medical records on the doctor–patient relationship and private practice. "I would take the electronic medical record. I would throw it to the bottom of the ocean," Nagel said, arguing EMRs "fail" the sanctity of the relationship between clinician and patient and drive physician burnout.
Nagel said the bill seeks to protect small and private providers — including acupuncturists, chiropractors and massage therapists — from the financial and administrative burdens of EMR systems. He told the committee that enforcement by federal programs like Medicare and Medicaid has effectively coerced clinicians into EMR adoption by tying payments to compliance. "If Medicare" — Nagel said — "they will withhold 15% if you don't comply," a reference to past incentive and penalty programs he cited in testimony.
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield senior…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

