Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing And Homelessness topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House floor splits over kohale housing funding request; debate centers on $50 million and program scope
Summary
Members sharply divided over a proposal tied to standing committee report 765 to fund kohale (village‑style) housing initiatives. Opponents criticized the proposed $50 million as an unfair permanent subsidy; supporters described kohale as service‑rich housing intended to help residents regain stability.
Get email alerts on the Housing And Homelessness topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Pierrick and others registered strong opposition to the proposal discussed under standing committee report 765, questioning the fairness of allocating large sums of taxpayer dollars for permanent housing. On the floor Pierrick said the proposal would ask for $50,000,000 to house people described as permanently homeless, and argued taxpayers should not be expected to underwrite housing for individuals who are not contributing in the same way as taxpayers.
Supporters, including Representative Martin, Representative Cappella and Representative Hussey, described the kohale approach as a broader set of housing options with on‑site services. “Basically, it is housing that provides services, emotional, social support, as well as services to help people get ready for jobs … meeting them where they are,” Representative Martin told colleagues, arguing the approach helps people attain stability and become independent where possible.
Floor discussion included arguments that kohale sites would include individuals who pay rent and contribute to local economies, and supporters urged even distribution of any program across the state. Opponents raised concerns about program scope and whether funds would end up supporting permanent housing beyond transitional or service‑oriented models.
The report was discussed at length and later addressed as part of the omnibus adoption; the transcript shows members on both sides asked to enter reservations or written comments into the record.

