Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Program Task Force topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves water program task force bill and a milk‑payment trust measure

2344515 · February 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources passed House Bill 2172 to create a legislatively led water program task force with membership and procedural changes; the committee also passed House Bill 2254 to require, with exceptions, that milk processors hold producer payments in trust until payment is complete.

The House Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources passed two measures after debate and technical amendment votes: House Bill 2172, to establish a water program task force to review state water programs and funding, and House Bill 2254, to require — with exceptions — that milk processors hold producer payments in trust until full payment is received.

House Bill 2172: why it matters

Lawmakers said HB2172 is intended to coordinate and synthesize disparate state water programs and funding streams so appropriators and the Legislature can better prioritize spending. Representative Neely, who moved the bill out of committee, told members the goal is to give the Legislature a working plan and to align agencies’ efforts on water, rather than create a duplicate permanent bureaucracy.

Committee debate focused on whether another task force was necessary and on how the panel would be structured. Representative Roth questioned whether the panel would add another layer to work already being done and pointed to roughly $94 million in various state water-related expenditures identified by legislative research. Representative Minnick and other supporters said a legislatively led review is necessary to coordinate multiple agencies and to give appropriators control over funding priorities.

Amendment and membership changes

Committee members adopted an amendment that reduced voting membership from 29 to 23, removed some of the additional legislative leadership appointments, added the Kansas Association of Conservation Districts as an appointing authority in place of a more general conservation group reference, and changed the regional representation requirement so the task force includes at least one member from each of the state’s five conservation regions (the original text required two from each region). Adviser Kyle Hamilton described the change to membership and noted the amendment’s objective was to streamline the panel while preserving broad stakeholder input.

The amendment to HB2172 was moved by Representative Neely and seconded by Representative Moseley; the committee approved the amendment. Representative Neely later moved that the committee pass HB2172 as amended; the committee approved the bill for passage and the measure will move from committee as amended.

House Bill 2254: trust requirement for milk payments

HB2254 would require milk processors, with some exceptions, to hold payments in trust for milk producers until full payment is received. Committee members approved a technical amendment to correct a cross‑reference in the milk‑producer definition (changing a subparagraph reference to the correct paragraph numbering). The technical amendment was moved and seconded, approved, and the committee passed HB2254 as amended.

What the committee recorded

- Amendment to HB2172 (reduce voting members to 23; revise appointing authorities; require at least one member per conservation region): mover Representative Neely; seconder Representative Moseley; outcome: amendment adopted. - Final motion on HB2172 as amended: mover Representative Neely; seconder recorded as Slingen Sheeepen (as recorded in the committee minutes); outcome: bill passed favorably as amended. - Technical amendment to HB2254 (correct definition cross‑reference): mover Representative Neely; seconder Representative Rosier; outcome: amendment adopted. - Final motion on HB2254 as amended: mover Representative Neely; seconder Representative Mosier; outcome: bill passed favorably as amended.

Committee discussion recorded concerns about task‑force cost and scope. Representative Fairchild and others said they prefer water policy remain within the dedicated water committee or be addressed through increased meeting time; Representative Minnick and other supporters countered that legislative oversight by appropriators is needed to coordinate many agencies that touch water policy and funding.

The committee did not record roll‑call tallies in the transcript for these motions; the chair announced the measures passed out of committee as amended. Both bills will proceed to the next step in the legislative process.