Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Plantation approves Crossroads land-use amendment and rezoning for up to 385 units; developer offers affordable and workforce housing options
Summary
The council approved a land-use amendment and rezoning allowing the Plantation Crossroads site on Peters Road to be developed for multi-family housing (applicant proposes 385 units). The developer offered a package of affordable and workforce options including 10% affordable units and targeted workforce units for public-safety/"hometown heroes."
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
On first reading of a land-use amendment and in a separate vote on rezoning, the Plantation City Council approved requests that will allow a residential development on the Crossroads office park along Peters Road.
The applicant requested a future land use change and rezone for about 24.28 gross acres at 8151'8221 Peters Road to permit mixed office and multifamily residential uses. If fully adopted, the land-use amendment and rezoning would permit up to 387 dwelling units by the underlying calculation; the applicant's proposal and site plan show 385 units total, an overall density the applicant described as roughly 16 units per acre on the 24.28-acre site.
Planning staff and the applicant described the project as part of the continuing evolution of Midtown: the southern portion of Midtown already contains more than 2,000 units approved or built, and the site is adjacent to office employment, retail and existing transit service. Planning director Dan Holmes noted that overall density in Midtown remains below plan targets and staff found the request compatible with the Midtown master plan.
Traffic and utilities were focal points. The applicant's traffic engineer, JoaquEDn Vargas, presented a traffic study that concluded the new residential trips would not materially change key intersections by standard professional thresholds; the consultant and staff also recommended working with Broward County on signal optimization. Utilities director Danny Polio said plant capacity exists but that infrastructure improvements (force-main/rerouting work and pump/lift-station upgrades) will be required for higher density and are typically developer-funded; he and staff said the work can be addressed as part of project permitting and infrastructure planning.
The developer (Styles Corporation) committed to including affordable and workforce housing elements in the proposal. Company representatives proposed a menu of options: a 10% affordable component (40 units at a deep affordability tier in the concept presented) and a tailored workforce "hometown heroes" program aimed at public-safety staff (units at 80% area median income for fire/EMS staffing needs). The applicant also offered a $50,000 contribution for a first-time homebuyer program and expressed willingness to explore partnerships with Habitat for Humanity. Planning staff included recommended conditions addressing capital impacts, sewer improvements and pedestrian/bicycle connectivity.
Public testimony at the hearing was largely supportive: business owners, Midtown Advisory Board representatives and several residents told the council the site is underused parking and that the addition of housing would support local businesses and transit-oriented goals. Crossroads building owner Chuck Gillum testified the current office market and building occupancy patterns support adding residential neighbors to the site.
Council members asked for clarifications on building height and compatibility with nearby developments; the applicant provided comparisons showing nearby projects up to roughly 10'12 stories in the district and described the proposed building as eight stories with a seven-level parking garage. Several council members praised the applicant's outreach and the proposed affordable/workforce commitments but asked staff to work through sewer/lift-station upgrades and confirm project phasing and infrastructure costs before site-plan approval.
Actions taken: the council voted to approve the land-use amendment (item 18) on first reading and separately approved the zoning ordinance (item 21) following the public hearing. Both votes were recorded in the minutes.
Why it matters: the approvals allow a major residential project in Midtown that the developer says will include an affordability component and workforce-targeted units for public-safety personnel. The council required further design- and infrastructure-level review during the site-plan and permitting stages to ensure sewer, drainage, and traffic mitigation measures are implemented.
What comes next: the developer will advance the site-plan process, coordinate sanitary sewer upgrades with utilities staff, and return to the council with design and infrastructure solutions required to permit construction; staff will track affordable/workforce-unit commitments as conditions of approval.
