Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Strategic Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bedford council begins update to 2018 strategic plan, prioritizes redevelopment, economic development and service excellence
Summary
At a Feb. 11 special strategic-planning session, Bedford city leaders reviewed a SWOT assessment, agreed to consolidate some focus areas and directed staff to draft an implementation plan that emphasizes redevelopment, economic development, organizational/service excellence and quality-of-life projects.
Get email alerts on the Strategic Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
BEDFORD, Texas — The Bedford City Council on Feb. 11 held a special strategic-planning session to revisit the city’s 2018 strategic plan and set near- and long-term priorities, including redevelopment of aging commercial and multifamily properties, efforts to attract new businesses and a continued emphasis on improving city services.
Consultant Hillary with SGR opened the session by outlining the role of “good governance” in long-term planning and the steps the council would take to convert individual perspectives into shared strategic focus areas. “Good governance…should consider all stakeholders,” Hillary said, adding that the council’s role is to set a clear vision so staff can build work plans to carry it out.
The session centered on a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) review compiled from pre-meeting interviews and a citizen survey. Council members and staff identified Bedford’s location, tree canopy, engaged council and schools as strengths; aging apartments, some commercial vacancies and a limited tax base as weaknesses; and redevelopment, trail connections and signature events as opportunities. Legislative changes at the state level and loss of local revenue were listed as external threats.
Council members spent much of the meeting debating how to frame the city’s top focus areas. Participants agreed to consolidate several prior categories: consolidation of “transformation” and “revitalization” into a single redevelopment/transformation focus; changing “economic vitality” language to “economic development;” and keeping a distinct emphasis on organizational or service excellence. Quality-of-life items — trails, parks, events and pedestrian connections — were discussed as a separate focus area that overlaps redevelopment and economic development.
Specific priorities and topics raised during the discussion included: - Redevelopment of aging apartments and commercial centers, and strategies to address a concentration of multifamily housing. Council members repeatedly noted the city’s approximately 35 apartment complexes and the need to address long-term maintenance and community impacts. - Bedford Commons (also discussed as Gateway/Campus West) and large vacant retail parcels (for example, the site of the former movie tavern and other large storefronts) as catalytic redevelopment opportunities. - Beautification and median/entrance improvements to create a clearer Bedford identity and attract customers and investment. - Parks, a linear trail and trail connections, including Meadow Park and a dog-park need/relocation, as both quality-of-life and potential destination enhancements. - Facility needs, including the future of Old Bedford School as an event or arts venue and longer-term discussion of a new city hall and other city facilities. - Public safety and staffing: the council discussed recruitment and retention across public safety and other departments, and asked staff to keep vacancies and staffing metrics under regular review. - Code enforcement and maintenance priorities — often summarized informally as “class up the joint” — as an immediate, visible step to support overall revitalization.
Council members instructed staff to convert the conversation into an actionable plan. Andrea, identified in the meeting as the city manager, and staff were tasked with drafting specific initiatives and timelines, estimating costs, and returning to the council on a regular cadence (quarterly or otherwise) so elected leaders can approve milestones and budget items. Hillary said the strategic plan should be a “living” document tied to budget decisions and that staff would present implementation steps for council review.
Council members noted several near-term items they want tracked in the implementation plan, including a streets condition target (mentioned in the session as a 75–80% target for acceptable PCI/condition), completion and implementation of the parks/trails master plan, drainage and infrastructure work, and a multifamily inspection program that remains an ongoing activity. A council member also reported that the local school district (Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD) recently passed a bond for school construction — “two brand new high schools and four new elementary schools,” the member said — a development council members noted as a community asset to factor into planning.
The council did not take formal votes at the session; instead members reached a working consensus on the focus areas and directed staff to draft the strategic-plan updates, tie recommended initiatives to budget and implementation schedules, and return for formal adoption. The group also asked staff to consider incentives and policy updates to remain competitive in attracting businesses and repurposing large vacant commercial properties.
What happens next: staff will produce a draft implementation plan that assigns actions, timelines and resources to the agreed focus areas and present it to the council for approval. Council members said they expect the plan to be revisited regularly and used to guide budget and ordinance decisions.
END NOTE: The Feb. 11 session was a planning workshop rather than a meeting that produced ordinances or binding actions. Council members and staff emphasized that the strategic plan’s value will depend on staff follow-through and periodic reporting back to the council.
