Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Law Vacancies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves bill to clarify vacancy appointments, removes conflicting judge-appointment language
Summary
The House Appropriations Committee voted to approve House Bill 176, clarifying how partisan vacancies are filled and removing conflicting statute language that had allowed judicial appointment outside party-submitted nominees.
The House Appropriations Committee approved House Bill 176, which clarifies the statutory process for filling vacancies in partisan elected offices and removes a conflicting provision that allowed a judge to appoint any qualified elector rather than requiring appointment from party-submitted nominees.
Representative Laurie Bratton, sponsor of the bill, told the committee the legislation removes conflicting language and provides a default path when the entity charged with appointing a vacancy does not act within the statutory timeframe. Under the bill as amended, if a vacancy is not filled by the governor or by a board of county commissioners as required, the relevant State or County Central Committee will fill the vacancy, or—if the vacating office was held by a nonpartisan official—a special election will be held.
Bratton said the legislation also creates a non-rebuttable presumption that a person who meets statutory qualifications to hold office is qualified, noting that some boards had refused to select any of the party-submitted nominees on the claimed basis that they were not “qualified.” Bratton cited multiple county incidents and said judges have told her they prefer not to be drawn into partisan appointment disputes.
The Secretary of State's office testified in support and proposed the amendment that adds parallel language to the county-commissioner vacancy statute (Title 18) so the same remedy applies when county commissioners fail to act. Joe Rubino, policy director and counsel for the secretary of state's office, said the amendment provides clarity and keeps courts out of the default appointment process.
Opponents and public comments: Jeremiah Rehman of the Wyoming County Commissioners Association said county commissioners had mostly fulfilled their duties and expressed concern about party central committees filling vacancies when central-committee positions are not fully populated. Gail Simmons, who testified as a Sheridan County precinct committee member, urged caution and argued that party precinct committees are elected by party voters and are not equivalent to a countywide electorate. Vincent Venata, who participated in a recent Park County vacancy matter, supported the bill as a way to keep judicial officers out of partisan appointment decisions.
Committee action: Representative Smith moved the committee to recommend HB176 do pass with the amendment (which adds the Title 18 county-commissioner provision); the motion carried on a roll-call vote (six ayes, one no). The committee asked the sponsor to manage the bill on the floor.
What it changes: HB176 removes the conflicting judge-appointment language from the election code, provides a backstop that returns appointment authority to the relevant party central committee when the primary appointing body fails to act, and implements a statutory presumption that candidates who meet statutory election qualifications are eligible to serve.
Ending: The committee approved the amended bill and sponsors said they will seek floor consideration.
