Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ai Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Waukesha IT board flags AI governance work; no timeline set

2232562 · February 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members were told staff will begin developing AI governance and risk controls for municipal use, though no timeline or formal action was set at the Feb. 5 meeting.

Waukesha City—s Information Technology Board discussed on Feb. 5 plans to develop AI governance for city systems and staff use but did not set a timeline or take formal action.

Greg Viness, the IT staff representative, relayed a message from Chris that the city will "be working on AI governance" and asked board members to consider potential issues and to email Chris with ideas. Viness said the city currently has limited direct AI use but that some applications (for example, the service desk) include AI features that suggest responses to ticket submitters.

Board members asked whether employees already have access to AI tools. Greg Viness said, "As of right now, there's nothing in place that's preventing anybody from using it." He added that he had not heard of staff requests for AI tools and said the intent is to get ahead of the technology so the city has "guide rails" in place when departments ask to adopt AI.

Members discussed Microsoft Copilot as a likely candidate because the city uses Microsoft cloud services, though participants said the board and staff will evaluate multiple vendors and security implications. One member observed that default inclusion of vendor-provided AI clients on systems can make proactive governance advisable.

No formal motion was made and no vote occurred on AI governance during the meeting. Staff said they will bring ideas forward when available and that the subject may appear on a future agenda when the city has draft guidance or vendor assessments to present.

Board adjourned at 6:22 p.m.