Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Meeting Minutes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
OCII commissioners debate meeting minutes, agenda-setting and governance procedures
Summary
Commissioners debated language in draft minutes and the process for setting agendas and placing items in closed session. The Commission approved the minutes after discussion and asked staff for follow-up; some commissioners called for workshops and more transparent agenda-setting.
The Commission on Community Investment and Infrastructure debated the text of draft meeting minutes and broader governance concerns during the Feb. 4 meeting, including who sets agendas and whether requested items had been placed on prior meeting agendas.
Chair Scott opened the regular agenda and the minutes for the prior meeting were pulled from the consent calendar for additional review. Commissioner Brackett objected to several paragraphs in the draft minutes that she said misstated prior events and described her decision to read portions of an earlier personal statement into the record. Brackett said the statements were "factual" and supported by emails and other documents; other commissioners said they disagreed with portions of Brackett's characterization of staff conduct and agenda setting.
The exchange lasted more than an hour. General Counsel Morales advised commissioners on parliamentary procedure, noting that the agenda review committee set the agenda under the bylaws and that the Commission can override via majority vote. Commissioners discussed the process for continuing items and whether a closed session had been requested earlier in the year.
After public comment and discussion, a motion to approve the minutes was made and seconded and passed by roll call vote, 3–1 (Vice Chair Aquino voted no). The Commission also agreed to continue other agenda items as noted in later motions and to hold a follow-up process item as needed.
Several commissioners requested workshops or reports on OCI-held properties and contract oversight going forward. Chair Scott and others emphasized time constraints on the day's agenda and the need to move to remaining items; commissioners agreed to continue some items so they can be discussed fully at a future meeting.
Commissioners and staff agreed to follow established rules for agenda review going forward; the general counsel reiterated that the agenda review committee or a majority vote of the Commission can set future agendas.
