Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Glenn Heights considers next steps after partner city pauses joint animal‑shelter project
Summary
City manager said a potential partnership with Hutchins on a joint animal shelter paused after Hutchins voted to temporarily nullify the partnership; city staff are exploring alternatives including local shelter renovation, networked nonprofit partners, and federal funding inquiries.
Clifford Blackwell, Glenn Heights City Manager, told the council that a proposed partnership with the city of Hutchins to develop a shared animal shelter has been put on hold after Hutchins’ council voted 4–1 to temporarily nullify the potential partnership.
Blackwell said Hutchins had led solicitation of architectural firms and received about eight submittals; staff from both cities evaluated proposals and planned to forward top candidates to their respective councils. He said Hutchins’ recent action paused that joint selection process and left Glenn Heights “back to the drawing board.”
Blackwell outlined options for Council to consider: pursue a full‑service local shelter with renovation of the existing facility, or operate a holding/transport model while partnering with an external shelter for intake, adoption and veterinary services. He said the SPCA’s Dallas‑region senior vice president, Melissa Weber, was not able to enter a partnership but has put Glenn Heights in contact with the Pet Coalition of Ellis County as a local nonprofit resource. Blackwell said he also has reached out to the city of Avila (spelling as spoken) and to Congresswoman Crockett’s office to ask about federal funding.
On costs, Blackwell recounted that staff previously received a rehabilitation estimate of about $1,300,000 to bring the existing building “up to code” and to retrofit it as a full‑service shelter; he said that figure was a project total derived from a per‑square‑foot quote and that additional operational staffing and ongoing costs would be required for a full‑service facility. He told Council the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration conducts inspections and audits for facilities that perform euthanasia, so meeting statutory and building‑code standards would be necessary for a local full‑service shelter.
Blackwell proposed returning to Council in roughly a month with due diligence and options; he also said staff would aim to discuss the matter again at the Council’s March 4 meeting. No formal decision or vote was taken during the work session.
The discussion noted prior practice: after the city’s Tri‑Cities agreement ended, Glenn Heights had operated as a temporary holding site and transported animals to partner facilities. Blackwell said staff will continue outreach to nonprofits and neighboring municipalities while preparing cost and operational options for Council.
