Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Discipline Cases topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Enforcement committee closes six complaints, advances several disciplinary recommendations
Summary
The Enforcement Committee voted to close six complaints on the consent agenda, authorized formal hearings or consent-order settlements in other matters including CPE deficiencies and unlicensed use of accounting terms, and recommended penalties for multiple cases involving test services performed without firm permits or peer review.
The Tennessee State Board of Accountancy's Enforcement Committee approved the recommended dispositions on a slate of disciplinary matters during its Feb. 3 committee session, moving several matters to formal hearing or consent-order settlement and closing other complaints.
Committee chair Kevin Monroe said the first six matters on the legal report were consent-agenda items recommended for closure after investigation; the committee voted to accept counsel's recommendation to close those six complaints by voice vote. Board counsel summarized the bases for closure, which included insufficient evidence to support due-care violations and lack of jurisdiction over fee disputes.
The committee then considered proposed disciplinary cases. Counsel recommended formal hearing authority or consent-order settlement in multiple matters:
- A CPE-deficiency case for which counsel recommended authorization to pursue a formal hearing and settlement authority via consent order, including a recommended $1,000 civil penalty and completion of missing CPE within 90 days or voluntary surrender/revocation.
- An unlicensed use-of-designation matter for which counsel recommended a $1,000 civil penalty and an order removing the term "accounting" from the respondent's logo within 60 days.
- Multiple cases (numbers 10–13 in committee materials) involving individuals or entities that performed attest/test services without a firm permit or required peer review; counsel recommended civil penalties for each case with recommended amounts reflecting aggravating factors, past warnings and the number of violations (committee materials listed proposed amounts ranging from $1,000 upward, and committee staff agreed to clarify the record to itemize separate violations where appropriate before full-board action).
Committee members moved and seconded a motion to accept counsel's proposed disciplinary recommendations for the identified cases, with the committee instructing staff to break out the specific violations and penalties in the final report to the full board. The motion passed on voice vote. For one high-priority matter (case number 9), staff advised the committee it had scheduled an informal summary-suspension hearing for the full board the next day because recently developed facts suggested a possible emergent public-protection concern; the committee did not act on that case and will defer to the informal hearing.
In representation cases, counsel recommended closing three matters referred by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) on the basis that the PCAOB had already imposed substantial sanctions; the committee accepted the recommendation to close those items. Another representation case involving alleged misappropriation is being returned to litigation monitoring because criminal proceedings and a competency evaluation are ongoing.
Committee chair Monroe closed the enforcement session by noting staff and counsel would refine the disciplinary recommendations and that several items would be presented to the full board for action the following day.
