Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Resource Officer Agreement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Angola Board of Works approves 2025 school resource officer agreement with MSD of Steuben County

2174163 · January 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Angola City Board of Works on Dec. 16 approved a 2025 school resource officer agreement with the Metropolitan School District of Steuben County; officials said the contract is unchanged except for updated effective dates.

The Angola City Board of Works voted Dec. 16 to approve a school resource officer agreement with the Metropolitan School District of (MSD) Steuben County for 2025, with board members saying the contract is unchanged other than updated effective dates.

City staff told the board the agreement carries the same dollar amount and terms as the previous year, with only the contract dates altered. Board members voted in favor; the meeting record shows no opposition.

The board’s action came after a brief discussion in which a speaker praised the presence of school resource officers, saying the schools are "very happy with the service they've been getting" and that the officers provide security for students. The speaker noted there are two resource officers in the county and city and said the arrangement "works out good for the kids and it looks good for the officers." The comments were framed as observations about local school safety and not as a change to the contract terms.

Votes at a glance - Approval of Dec. 2 minutes: motion, second; approved 3-0. - Approval of 2025 school resource officer agreement with MSD of Steuben County: motion, second; approved 3-0.

Department heads reported no additional items. The board scheduled its next meeting for Monday, Jan. 6, and then adjourned.

Details omitted from the meeting record: the transcript indicates the contract amount remained the same but does not specify the dollar value or the exact revised effective dates; those items were described as "not specified" in the meeting discussion.