Get email alerts on the Closed Session Litigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Perris council reports closed-session discussions on multiple lawsuits; no reportable action
Summary
City staff reported the council met in closed session to confer with legal counsel on several existing and potential litigation matters involving Panettone v. City of Perris and intercity suits with Menifee; no reportable action was taken.
The Perris City Council reported at its Dec. 10 meeting that it met in closed session under Government Code provisions to discuss several litigation matters and potential litigation.
Assistant or city attorney Ms. Soltani reported the council met pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(1) to confer with counsel on three existing litigation matters, including Panettone v. City of Perris (listed in the transcript as CVR 122-03028), City of Menifee v. City of Perris (CVR 122-030) and City of Perris v. City of Menifee (case number CVR 129-03456). She said no reportable action was taken on those matters.
Soltani also told the council it met concerning one potential litigation matter pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.94 and that no reportable action was taken on that item as well.
The report was limited to stating the statutory authority for the closed session, listing the matters considered and confirming there was no reportable action. No further details about the claims or next steps were provided in open session at the Dec. 10 meeting.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
